Friday, August 19, 2011

Jesus Saved. Now what will we do with ThAt?!?

A recent Facebook post by Rev. Dr. Allan R. Bevere began a conversation about the necessity of participation in ecumenical dialogue. Several weighed in espousing a belief in relativism, some arguing in favor and others against. Unbeknownst to them, most fell into the categories of either inclusivist or pluralist. Allan weighed in as a member of "both categories". I weighed in as an "outside the three".


The three traditional categories of interfaith position, exclusivist, inclusivist, and pluralist don't do it for me. While I admire the exclusivist's passion in their faith, I dislike the consequence of it when in discourse with others as it leaves little to no room for any other opinion to be valid, of value, or sometimes, even to be heard. The inclusivists I find closer to something that makes sense to me but quickly comes to a halt as their view of salvation in my opinion may be short sited. I admire too the pluralist's respect for the value of diversity, for their desire for unity, and many other aspects of their position. However, I hold to the belief that there is ultimate truth, that God has revealed it to and for humanity, and that Jesus Christ did do something very important here, as both human and God. How humanity interprets that "ultimate truth" and "revelation" is a different matter, one for much discussion.


Which brings me to this: the older I get, the more I come to believe that Jesus really did come for everyone. Yes, everyone. In other words, we are all saved. However, I currently believe that with salvation comes responsibility (think limited free-will). You must choose to participate in that which you are already enrolled, or choose to reject that association -- just like Adam and Eve. Reject it and suffer the consequences. Accept it and accept the responsibilities of it. Accepting also comes with bonus packages should you choose such as gifts of the Holy Spirit given in baptism to fulfill those responsibilities and the Church to walk with you in community and offer a place of belonging as you work together. I do not yet see a middle ground.

However, I do see a lot of people in the world trying to make sense of what they observe. I see seekers and searchers trying to determine what they are doing with this higher being that they witness in creation. Their life experiences, exploration of the world, and discoveries can and do inform humanity as to the bigger picture that God has created/allowed in the world. Like me, they seek and search for meaning, understanding, belonging, and purpose. This should be no surprise as God created humanity and did so in God's image. God did not create a series of classes of humanoid beings of various values to be weighed, ranked and used.

While I have a long way to go to test this theory, it is where I stand on such matters for the moment. (Admittedly, I spent a month trying to figure out what to do with baptism if we are all saved. That was thanks to an off hand comment overheard at worship on Sunday from a stranger.) That said, I truly welcome your insights. Your thoughts will help me come to understand God better too. And for that, I thank you in advance.

Tuesday, March 29, 2011

Bell's Hell

I never post enough. I'm sorry. So it's with great joy I offer the commentary of one professor of Church History (among other things) on Rob Bell's new book Love Wins. Dr. John Byron, author of The Biblical World blog, reviews Bell's work in a series of posts, the second of which is the most interesting as of this writing.

Enjoy, Love Wins: My Thoughts on an Attempt at Asking some Important Questions (Part II).